Blog Layout

A Guide to Contracts of Employment under Irish Law


Contracts of Employment under Irish Law


Statement of Terms / Contract of Employment under Irish Employment Law


The below case is illustrative of how the issue of non-provision of a statement of terms / contract of employment, is dealt with under Irish employment law. 


In A Bar Manager v A Public House ADJ-00026363, the employee brought a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), asserting that he never received any document in writing setting out the details of his terms and conditions of employment. The WRC accepted that the employee never requested such a statement. The employer did not dispute this evidence. 


It was apparent therefore, that no statement concerning his terms and conditions of employment was issued to the employee by the employer. 


Why is a Statement of Terms / Contract of Employment necessary? 


The employer in his case availed of the assistance of a human resources specialist and it was deemed unlikely that he was unaware of his legal responsibilities to this employee regarding his entitlement to a written statement setting out his terms and conditions of employment. 


The effect of not providing such a statement means that the employment relationship is tarnished with uncertainty and it is difficult for the employee to assert his rights during, and at the termination of his employment. 


When should an employee receive a Statement of Terms / Contract of Employment?


The WRC went on to note that Section 3 of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act was amended by the Employment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2018, resulting in a new obligation on employers to provide a written statement of certain terms and conditions of employment within five days of an employee’s start date. 


What should be included in a Statement of Terms / Contract of Employment?


Generally written up in the form of a contract, a statement of terms includes the following:


  • The name of the employer and the employee;
  • The address of the employer;
  • The place of work, or, where there is no fixed place of work, the statement must specify that the employee is required to work at various places;
  • The job title or the nature of the work that the employee is required to carry out;
  • The date that the employee commences in the job;
  • If the contract is temporary, the expected duration, or if the contract is for a fixed-term, then the end date of the fixed-term;
  • The rate or method of calculation of the employee’s pay;
  • The frequency of pay;
  • Any terms or conditions relating to hours of work (including overtime);
  • Any conditions relating to paid leave (other than paid sick leave);
  • Any terms or conditions relating to –
  • Incapacity for work due to sickness or injury and paid sick leave;
  • pensions and pension schemes;
  • The notice that the employee is required to give and the notice that he or she is entitled to receive at the termination of their employment;
  • Details of any collective agreement which affects the employee’s terms and conditions of employment.


Redress for not receiving a Statement of Terms / Contract of Employment


The WRC referred to the Labour Court decision in the case of Megan Hayes Kelly and Beechfield Private Homecare, DWT 1919, where Ms Hayes Kelly claimed that her employer was in breach of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act because there were omissions and errors in her contract of employment. In his determination on the case, the Chairman of the Court, Mr Haugh, considered the errors and omissions to be “at the serious end of the spectrum” and awarded the maximum of four weeks’ pay in redress. 


As the failure to issue any statement of terms and conditions of employment must be considered to be more serious than issuing an imperfect statement, the WRC followed the authority of the Labour Court and made the maximum award of four weeks.



Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
6 June 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
5 June 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
3 June 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: