Blog Layout

Bringing a Workplace Relations Commission Claim


Workplace Relations Commission Claims

Bringing a Workplace Relations Commission Complaint

In this article, we examine the key points to consider, before bringing a Workplace Relations Commission complaint against your employer. 

Enforcing Employment Rights


The Workplace Relations Act 2015 established the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) replacing the Labour Relations Commission, Rights Commissioner Service, Equality Tribunal, and National Employment Rights Authority. Please consult an employment solicitor to advise of the various heads of claim that may be applicable to a workplace dispute.


WRC Adjudication


Adjudication Officers inquire into complaints or disputes, give the parties to the complaint or dispute an opportunity to be heard by the Adjudication Officer and to present to him\her any evidence relevant to the complaint or dispute and make a decision in relation to the complaint or dispute in accordance with the relevant redress provision. 


Date of Complaint


In general, Adjudication Officers cannot entertain a complaint if it has been presented to the Director General of the WRC after the expiration of the period of 6 months beginning on the date of the contravention, unless there are exceptional circumstances.


Excusing Delay of Complaint


In considering if reasonable cause exists, it is for the employee to show that there are reasons which both explain the delay and afford an excuse for the delay. The explanation must be reasonable, that is to say it must make sense, be agreeable to reason and not be irrational or absurd. Please consult an employment solicitor if the date of the wrong is contested or uncertain.


Frivolous, Vexatious or Misconceived


Section 22 of the Workplace Relations Act states the Director of the Workplace Commission may dismiss a claim at any stage if it is of the opinion that it has been made in bad faith or as frivolous, vexatious or misconceived or relates to a trivial matter (e.g. if the employee has no reasonable chance in succeeding, then the law says that it is frivolous to bring the case). 


Exhausting Internal Procedure


The Adjudication Officer must be satisfied that the employee has brought his or her complaint to the attention of the employer, so that the employer has had an opportunity to address the matter internally (e.g. Conway v Ulster Bank, the WRC found that the employeet had not acted reasonably in resigning without first having “substantially utilised the grievance procedure to attempt to remedy her complaints.”)


Appealing a WRC Decision


If either party, the employer or the employee, is unhappy with the decision of the Adjudication Officer following a WRC hearing, they have 42 days from the date of the adjudication to make an appeal to the Labour Court. The subsequent hearing at the Labour Court will be on a 'de novo' basis, meaning the Labour Court hears the case again, from the beginning. 


Enforcing a WRC Decision


If an employer or employee fails to adhere to the final decision of the WRC or Labour Court , they may make an application directly to the District Court for an order directing the other party to comply with that decision.


Share

CCTV and Workplace Relations Commission Complaints
by RG343171 16 February 2025
The case of Nkemka Patrick Okachi v Sodexo Ireland Limited ADJ-00045306 examines the circumstances under which an employer will be compelled to utilise CCTV footage as part of an investigation and disciplinary process.
Gross misconduct under Irish law.
23 January 2025
The case of Ioan Pop v City Break Apartments Limited (ADJ-00045335) examines the circumstances under which an employer will be deemed to have acted reasonably, when terminating the employment of an employee for gross misconduct.
by RG343171 22 January 2025
The case of Denis McCallig v Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) (ADJ00052727) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be considered to have been made redundant, retired, or alternatively resigned.
Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Show More
Share by: