Blog Layout

Can you be fired for looking for another job?


Can you be fired for looking for another job?

Can an employee be fired for looking for another job?


In general, no. If an employee was fired for looking for another job, they may be entitled to bring a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977.


Fired for looking for another job - case law


In the case of A Driver v A Driver Maintenance Company (ADJ00018286), the employee challenged the termination of his employment on foot of his employer discovering that he was seeking alternative employment.


The employee joined the company in May 2017 and worked without incident until July of 2018. On 02 July 2018, the employee was called into the office of the owner of the company. The owner of the company noted that he was aware the employee was looking for alternative work. He suggested that the employee 'must not be happy in his current role' and was therefore summarily dismissed. The employee was given no right of reply, no notice and was not allowed to appeal this decision.


Despite the existence of both a disciplinary and grievance policy, neither was invoked by the employer. Whilst the employee notified his union representatives, the employer refused to engage in any meaningful way. After some correspondence, the employee was eventually issued formal notification of termination of employment.


Fired for looking for another job - decision


The Workplace Relations Commission found that the employer, in dismissing the employee on account of him seeking alternative employment, had breached the provisions of the Unfair Dismissals Act. That being the case, the employee was awarded €10,560.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Gross misconduct under Irish law.
23 January 2025
The case of Ioan Pop v City Break Apartments Limited (ADJ-00045335) examines the circumstances under which an employer will be deemed to have acted reasonably, when terminating the employment of an employee for gross misconduct.
by RG343171 22 January 2025
The case of Denis McCallig v Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) (ADJ00052727) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be considered to have been made redundant, retired, or alternatively resigned.
Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
6 June 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Show More
Share by: