Blog Layout

Can you be fired for looking for another job?


Can you be fired for looking for another job?

Can an employee be fired for looking for another job?


In general, no. If an employee was fired for looking for another job, they may be entitled to bring a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission under Section 8 the Unfair Dismissals Act, 1977.


Fired for looking for another job - case law


In the case of A Driver v A Driver Maintenance Company (ADJ00018286), the employee challenged the termination of his employment on foot of his employer discovering that he was seeking alternative employment.


The employee joined the company in May 2017 and worked without incident until July of 2018. On 02 July 2018, the employee was called into the office of the owner of the company. The owner of the company noted that he was aware the employee was looking for alternative work. He suggested that the employee 'must not be happy in his current role' and was therefore summarily dismissed. The employee was given no right of reply, no notice and was not allowed to appeal this decision.


Despite the existence of both a disciplinary and grievance policy, neither was invoked by the employer. Whilst the employee notified his union representatives, the employer refused to engage in any meaningful way. After some correspondence, the employee was eventually issued formal notification of termination of employment.


Fired for looking for another job - decision


The Workplace Relations Commission found that the employer, in dismissing the employee on account of him seeking alternative employment, had breached the provisions of the Unfair Dismissals Act. That being the case, the employee was awarded €10,560.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 Aug, 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
09 Aug, 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 Jul, 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
06 Jun, 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
05 Jun, 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
03 Jun, 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: