Blog Layout

No Compensation for Successful Unfair Dismissal Claim


Compensation for Unfair Dismissal

Compensation for Unfair Dismissal Claim


Although an employee may bring their employer before the Workplace Relations Commission in respect of a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act, even if they are successful, an Adjudication Officer has, within their remit, the power to award a successful complainant no compensation depending on the circumstances.


In A Diver -V- A Limited Company (ADJ00018129), the Adjudication Officer in this matter, Ms Niamh O’Carroll Kelly BL, decided to award the complainant no compensation despite bringing a well founded case of unfair dismissal.


Counterclaim by Employer


In summary, the complainant was provided with approximately €10,000 worth of diver training. He was asked to undertake a very important and time sensitive task on behalf of the respondent company. When he arrived to undertake the task, he demanded more pay than had been agreed based on a previous rate he had been given in error. The manager and owner of the respondent company noted that the previous rate paid to him was an administrative error and was never agreed between the parties. He further noted that he had spent a considerable amount of money upskilling the complainant and now felt betrayed that the complainant was effectively trying to “blackmail” him as he knew the importance of this particular job, to the respondent company.


Summary Dismissal


The owner of the respondent company told the complainant “you’re finished”. The complainant contended that he was effectively dismissed from that moment. The owner of the respondent company later emailed the complainant to inform him that he was suspended pending an investigation and disciplinary process. He then invited the complainant to attend an investigatory meeting to discuss the issues before them. The complainant never attended the meeting arguing that he had already been dismissed and that there was no further issue to discuss.


He then submitted a claim seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under the Unfair Dismissals Act.


Behaviour of the Employee


The Adjudication Officer in this matter found that there had been an absence of due process and fair procedure with respect to the manner in which the complainant was dismissed.


Notwithstanding this, she did agree with the respondent that the complainant was effectively trying to blackmail the company and therefore, despite finding that the complainant’s complaint was well founded, she decided to award him no compensation.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
6 June 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
5 June 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
3 June 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: