Blog Layout

Dismissal and Absence from Work


dismissal absence from work

Can an employee be dismissed for absenteeism?


Yes, however, an employer can only dismiss the employee concerned if the absenteeism is repeated, the employer has provided the employee with verbal and/or written warnings, afforded the employee the opportunity to improve their attendance record and undertook a disciplinary process in line with the company policies and procedures.


Case law on dismissal and absence from work


A matter recently came before the Labour Court on appeal by an employee, Mr Stephen Redmond, against the decision of the Workplace Relations Commission in his complaint against his former employer, Seetec Employment & Skills Ireland, under the Unfair Dismissals Act. Mr Redmond commenced employment with Seetec on 10 October 2016 and was subsequently dismissed on 17 June 2019.


In summary, Mr Redmond appealed the decision to dismiss him on the basis of repeated absenteeism, on the grounds that the processes and procedures leading to his dismissal were flawed. 


Despite the acceptance by both parties and the Labour Court that the repeated absenteeism of Mr Redmond were not conducive to a positive working relationship, the Labour Court noted that the employer’s practice of issuing repeated final written warnings had the effect of creating uncertainty as to the significance of the disciplinary penalties invoked. 


The Labour Court could find no basis in the written disciplinary policy of the employer for the repeated issuance of overlapping final written warnings to Mr Redmond. 


Disciplinary process and absenteeism


The Labour Court found it self evident that a coherent application of the comprehensive written disciplinary policy of the employer required the execution of the disciplinary steps in the manner described in the policy. Therefore, a strict application of the employer’s own disciplinary policies and procedures was not followed.


That being the case, the Labour Court determined that the amount of redress which was just and equitable, having regard to all of the circumstances of the case, was €5,400.


Dismissal and absence from work – conclusion


The takeaway from this case is that an employer should strictly adhere to their own disciplinary policies and procedures if they intend to evoke same for the repeated absenteeism of an employee.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

CCTV and Workplace Relations Commission Complaints
by RG343171 16 February 2025
The case of Nkemka Patrick Okachi v Sodexo Ireland Limited ADJ-00045306 examines the circumstances under which an employer will be compelled to utilise CCTV footage as part of an investigation and disciplinary process.
Gross misconduct under Irish law.
23 January 2025
The case of Ioan Pop v City Break Apartments Limited (ADJ-00045335) examines the circumstances under which an employer will be deemed to have acted reasonably, when terminating the employment of an employee for gross misconduct.
by RG343171 22 January 2025
The case of Denis McCallig v Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM) (ADJ00052727) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be considered to have been made redundant, retired, or alternatively resigned.
Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Show More
Share by: