Blog Layout

Dismissal and Absence from Work


dismissal absence from work

Can an employee be dismissed for absenteeism?


Yes, however, an employer can only dismiss the employee concerned if the absenteeism is repeated, the employer has provided the employee with verbal and/or written warnings, afforded the employee the opportunity to improve their attendance record and undertook a disciplinary process in line with the company policies and procedures.


Case law on dismissal and absence from work


A matter recently came before the Labour Court on appeal by an employee, Mr Stephen Redmond, against the decision of the Workplace Relations Commission in his complaint against his former employer, Seetec Employment & Skills Ireland, under the Unfair Dismissals Act. Mr Redmond commenced employment with Seetec on 10 October 2016 and was subsequently dismissed on 17 June 2019.


In summary, Mr Redmond appealed the decision to dismiss him on the basis of repeated absenteeism, on the grounds that the processes and procedures leading to his dismissal were flawed. 


Despite the acceptance by both parties and the Labour Court that the repeated absenteeism of Mr Redmond were not conducive to a positive working relationship, the Labour Court noted that the employer’s practice of issuing repeated final written warnings had the effect of creating uncertainty as to the significance of the disciplinary penalties invoked. 


The Labour Court could find no basis in the written disciplinary policy of the employer for the repeated issuance of overlapping final written warnings to Mr Redmond. 


Disciplinary process and absenteeism


The Labour Court found it self evident that a coherent application of the comprehensive written disciplinary policy of the employer required the execution of the disciplinary steps in the manner described in the policy. Therefore, a strict application of the employer’s own disciplinary policies and procedures was not followed.


That being the case, the Labour Court determined that the amount of redress which was just and equitable, having regard to all of the circumstances of the case, was €5,400.


Dismissal and absence from work – conclusion


The takeaway from this case is that an employer should strictly adhere to their own disciplinary policies and procedures if they intend to evoke same for the repeated absenteeism of an employee.


Further Information


For further information, please contact the author of this article, Barry Crushell.


Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 Aug, 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
09 Aug, 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 Jul, 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
06 Jun, 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
05 Jun, 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
03 Jun, 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: