Blog Layout

Reporting a Data Breach - The Key Considerations


Reporting a Data Breach

Introduction


A personal data breach occurs when the data is accessed, disclosed, altered, lost or destroyed in contravention of an organisation's obligation to keep personal data in its possession safe and secure.


As an employer, you have a duty to ensure the safety and integrity of the data you store and process on behalf of your employees and clients. However, if a data breach occurs, you may be under an obligation to notify the Data Protection Commission (DPC) within 72 hours. 


In determining how serious you consider the breach to be for affected individuals, you should take into account the impact the breach could potentially have on individuals whose data has been exposed. In assessing this potential impact you should consider the nature of the breach, the cause of the breach, the type of data exposed and whether the personal data of vulnerable individuals has been exposed. 


There are three levels:


Low Risk: The breach is unlikely to have an impact on individuals, or the impact is likely to be minimal


Medium Risk: The breach may have an impact on individuals, but the impact is unlikely to be substantial


High Risk: The breach may have a considerable impact on affected individuals


Severe Risk: The breach may have a critical, extensive or dangerous impact on affected individuals.


If the risk is ‘low’, you may not be required to report a breach, but, it may be advisable to contact your solicitor to determine whether communication with the DPC is required. 


Information Required when Reporting a Data Breach


1. Breach Timeline

1.1. Do you know the date on which the breach initially occurred?

1.2. The date on which the breach began

1.3. Do you know the time at which the breach occurred?

1.4. Is the breach ongoing?

1.5. If you became aware of the Breach is more than 72 hours ago, please enter the reasons for the late notification of the breach to Data Protection Commission

1.6. How were you made aware of the breach?


2. About the Breach

2.1. Does the Breach involve accidental or unlawful:

2.1.1. Destruction

2.1.2. Loss

2.1.3. Alteration

2.1.4. Disclosure of transmitted personal data

2.1.5. Disclosure of stored personal data

2.1.6. Disclosure of personal data otherwise processed

2.1.7. Access to transmitted personal data

2.1.8. Access to stored personal data

2.1.9. Access to personal data otherwise processed

2.1.10. Unavailability

2.2. What is the nature of the Breach:

2.2.1. Device Lost or Stolen (encrypted)

2.2.2. Device Lost or Stolen (unencrypted)

2.2.3. Paper lost/stolen

2.2.4. Disclosure (unauthorised)

2.2.5. Inappropriate disposal of paper

2.2.6. Hacking

2.2.7. Malware

2.2.8. Phishing

2.2.9. E-Waste (personal data present on obsolete device)

2.2.10. Unintended online publication

2.2.11. Network security compromised

2.2.12. Website security breach

2.2.13. Other

2.3. Please describe how the Breach occurred

2.4. Please select the cause of the Breach

2.4.1. Employee error or omission

2.4.2. Employee intentional act

2.4.3. Contractor error or omission

2.4.4. Contractor intentional act

2.4.5. External intentional act

2.4.6. External unintentional act

2.4.7. Unknown


3. About the Breached Data


3.1. What identifying details relating to individuals were disclosed? 

3.1.1. Data subject identify (name, surname, date of birth)

3.1.2. PPSN (or other national identification number

3.1.3. Contact details

3.1.4. Identification data (passport, licence data etc)

3.1.5. Economic or Financial data

3.1.6. Location data

3.1.7. Criminal convictions, offences or security measures

3.1.8. Other

3.2. Were any special categories of data involved ?

3.3. Do you know the number of affected individuals?

3.4. Please enter the approximate number of affected individuals

3.5. Do you know the number of affected records?

3.6. Please enter the approximate number of records affected

3.7. Are data subjects in another member state likely to be affected?

3.8. Were vulnerable individuals affected ?

3.9. Does the breach involve personal data maintained for the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties in the State ?


4. Measures in place before the Breach and measures to respond to the Breach


4.1. Measures in place before the Breach and measures to respond to the Breach

4.2. What measures have you taken / do you propose to take in response to the breach?

4.3. Are the mitigating actions fully implemented?

4.4. Have you secured/retrieved the breached data?


5. Consequences/Damages of the Breach for affected individuals


5.1. What in your view are the potential consequences of the breach for affected individuals? 

5.1.1. Loss of control over their personal data

5.1.2. Limitation of their rights

5.1.3. Discrimination

5.1.4. Identity theft

5.1.5. Fraud

5.1.6. Financial loss

5.1.7. Unauthorised reversal of pseudonymisation

5.1.8. Damage to reputation

5.1.9. Loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy

5.1.10. Other

5.2. Self-Declaration: How severe is the breach for affected individuals ? 

5.2.1. Low Risk

5.2.2. Medium Risk

5.2.3. High Risk

5.2.4. Severe Risk


6. Notification to affected individuals


6.1. Have you notified the affected individuals of the Breach?

6.1.1. Yes

6.1.2. Partially

6.1.3. No

6.1.4. No, but the affected individuals will be notified

6.2. How many affected individuals were informed? 

6.3. How were the affected individuals informed? 

6.3.1. Formal letter

6.3.2. Email Message

6.3.3. Telephone call

6.3.4. Website notice

6.3.5. Social media notification

6.3.6. Press / media notification

6.3.7. Other

6.4. Please outline the reasons for using this channel

6.5. What information was communicated to the affected individuals? In particular, please indicate if you have related to affected individuals the steps they may take to mitigate any adverse consequences which have been caused or could be caused to them by this breach.

6.6. What information was communicated to the affected individuals? In particular, please indicate if you have related to affected individuals the steps they may take to mitigate any adverse consequences which have been caused or could be caused to them by this breach.


Conclusion


Crushell & Co have extensive experience in advising both employers and employees on all aspects of Irish data protection and privacy laws, including responding to potential data breaches. 


We counsel clients on their rights and responsibilities under the data protection regulations, raising or responding to an access request, as well as raising or responding to a notification or complaint to the Data Protection Commission. 


Speak to one of our Dublin based specialist data protection solicitors to determine how we can best assist you with your workplace data protection, privacy or GDPR matter.

Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
6 June 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
5 June 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
3 June 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: