Blog Layout

The Equal Status Act – Service Discrimination


The Equal Status Act – Service Discrimination

Introduction – Discrimination as to Service


A recent decision of the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) reaffirms a generally accepted provision, that in order to be discriminated against on the grounds of one's non receipt or delivery of service, one must be in a position, or qualified to avail of that service.


In the present case, the complainant, a father of two children attending a Primary School (the Father), submitted that the alleged behaviour of the school in failing to provide him with information relating to his children’s attendance, amounted to discrimination on the grounds of gender. 


The respondent (the School) refuted the complaint and submitted a prima facia case of discriminatory treatment did not exist.


Discrimination under the Equal Status Act


The matter referred for adjudication was whether or not the Father was discriminated against pursuant to Section 3(1)(a) and 3(2)(a) of the Equal Status Act (the Act) and in terms of Section 7 (2) of that Act. 


The details of the circumstances regarding the children which were raised during the hearing are not recounted in this article, save to say that the WRC noted that the appropriate agencies had been involved in the situation. It was recognised that the circumstances were difficult for the Father, and where the Father does not believe the School treated him fairly in how it responded to his concerns. The WRC did empathise with all the parties involved and acknowledge the issue was a matter of distress for the Father. The evidence submitted supported the proposition that the School did in fact respond to the Father’s issues and met with him on a number of occasions, despite some of the evidence being disputed between the parties.


Proving Discrimination under the Equal Status Act


With respect to a complaint under the Equal Status Acts, a person making an allegation of discrimination must first establish a prima facie case of discriminatory treatment. Once a prima facie case of discrimination could be established by the Father, the burden of proof would then shift to the School to rebut the presumption of discrimination.


Defining “Service” under the Equal Status Act


Section 2 of the Equal Status Acts defines “service” as a service or facility of any nature which is available to the public generally or a section of the public generally or a section of the public and, without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, includes access to and use of any place. 


Application of Equal Status Act 


The School is an Educational establishment, and therefore section 7 of the Act applies.  


Section 7(2) of the Act states that an educational establishment shall not discriminate in relation to— (a) the admission or the terms or conditions of admission of a person as a student to the establishment; (b) the access of a student to any course, facility or benefit provided by the establishment, (c) any other term or condition of participation in the establishment by a student, or (d) the expulsion of a student from the establishment or any other sanction against the student.


The Father was not a pupil of the School or a person that could legitimately avail of the services provided by the School as set out in Section 7(1) of the Act.  On that basis the nature of the Father’s case does not apply to section 7 of the Act. 


The WRC therefore did not find a prima facie case of discriminatory treatment existed in this instance.



Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 Aug, 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
09 Aug, 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 Jul, 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
06 Jun, 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
05 Jun, 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
03 Jun, 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: