Blog Layout

Covid-19 and Employee Wellbeing


Negative impact on physical and mental wellbeing of Irish workers under Covid-19 highlighted in national research - Laya Healthcare

Employers have a duty to ensure employees’ safety, health and welfare at work, as far as reasonably practicable.


To reduce the spread of Covid-19, employers must take certain actions. These include providing and maintain a safe workplace where all measure necessary to prevent the spread of Covid-19 have been implemented, prevent any risk of exposure between employees, prevent any improper conduct or behaviour likely to put the safety, health and welfare of employees at risk, provide instruction and training to employees on Covid-19 health and safety precautions, and provide protective clothing and equipment to employees, that may be pertinent to prevent the spread of Covid-19. 


New research released by Laya healthcare shows that one in three employees in Ireland are classed as vulnerable to covid-19 impacts, with an underlying health condition such as asthma, diabetes or cardiac issues.


 Key Report Findings:

• One in three employees in Ireland are vulnerable workers with an underlying condition

• Four in 10 Irish workers (39%) are struggling to cope with everyday life under Covid-19

• 91% of Irish workers have reported some level of anxiety during Covid-19

• One in 10 are seeking help with their mental wellbeing

• Estimated cost of returning employees to work is €37,138

• Almost eight out of 10 (78%) have not taken any sick leave since March


Commenting on the research, Sinead Proos, Head of Health and Wellbeing at Laya healthcare said: “These results highlight the implications we must consider as we try to work and maintain ‘business as usual’ during a pandemic. The majority of Irish workers (91%) reported some level of anxiety, in part due to concern about getting sick from Covid-19, family and friends getting sick and worrying about a second surge.


“To address workers’ concerns, protect the one in three employees who are vulnerable workers and fully comply with health and safety guidelines, long-term investment in building resources, education and training needs to be made. With over 270,000 companies operating in Ireland, the total cost of returning employees to workplaces could well be in the region of €10 billion. The coming months are going to be incredibly challenging. Early intervention and a culture of resilience needs to be prioritised to manage people’s mental and physical wellbeing long-term — both for those working in the office and remotely. Irish employers should ask themselves, ‘is my workforce coping, and if not, do we have the right tools to support them over the coming months and years?’.”


When an employer becomes aware that an employee has an underlying health condition, such as asthma, diabetes or cardiac issues, which may put them at greater risk than most people, if infected with Covid-19, that employer has a responsibility to ensure extra precautions are taken to ensure the safety of the employee concerned.

Share

Remote  work laws in Ireland
by RG343171 16 August 2024
The case of Aline Karabko v TikTok Technology Ltd (ADJ-00051600) examines the obligations employers have, under Irish law, when a request for remote work is made by an employee. As the law in Ireland currently stands, there is no right to remote work per se. This may be overcome when an individual has been guaranteed remote work in their contract of employment or remote work has been determined to constitute a reasonable accommodation in accordance with relevant employment legislation, where applicable. However, none of these exceptions applied in the present case.
Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act
9 August 2024
The case of Dean Hart v Komfort Kare (ADJ00051923) examines the circumstances under which a request for time off, by a parent, from their employer, must be given due consideration. Dean Hart (the Complainant) brought a complaint under Section 18 of the Parental Leave Act 1998 against Komfort Kare (the Respondent) to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), alleging that they denied him the right to take force majeure despite extenuating circumstances.
Constructive Dismissal and Sexual Harassment
31 July 2024
The case of Care Worker v Costern Unlimited Company (ADJ00046268) examines the circumstances under which it will be deemed reasonable for an employee to resign and bring a claim of unfair dismissal by way of constructive dismissal on foot of a failure of their employer to properly investigate their complaints.
Payment of notice pay after probation
6 June 2024
The case of Eric Bentley v Carcharger EV Limited (ADJ00050468) examines the circumstances under which an employee will be entitled to a payment in lieu of notice if dismissed during their probationary period. This is a very interesting case, as it was brought under the payment of wages provisions, but decided upon under notice legislation.
Interview discrimination
5 June 2024
The case of A Job Applicant v A Public Body (ADJ00049321) examines the burden of proof in discrimination claims, particularly when discrimination is being claimed at the interview stage.
The Burden of Proof in Constructive Dismissal Claims in Ireland
3 June 2024
The case of Mark Lowry v JJ Fleming and Company Limited (ADJ00036677) examines the burden of proof issues that often arise in constructive dismissal claims. Uniquely, the employer offered no substantive evidence to support their case, yet won, highlighting the very difficult hurdles an employee often faces in bringing an unfair dismissal claim following their resignation.
Show More
Share by: